A few months ago, a sales leader told me something interesting.
One of their top-performing reps had hit 130% of their quota, but their commission check didn’t match what they expected. The rep wasn’t angry, just confused. And that confusion led to bigger questions:
- Is our sales compensation structure clear?
- Are we rewarding the right behaviors?
- Do our reps actually understand how they’re paid?
The truth is, a messy or outdated compensation structure can quietly hurt your team’s motivation, trust, and performance, even if revenue looks good on paper.
This blog is here to help you fix that.
We’ll walk you through how to build a sales compensation structure that’s fair, transparent, and designed to drive results. You’ll learn:
- What a sales compensation structure is and its Key components
- Different types of comp models (and when to use them)
- A step-by-step framework to build your own plan
- Real examples by role, from SDRs to Presales Engineers to Customer Success
- How to align compensation with your company’s goals
Whether you’re building a new sales commission plan or fixing an old one, this guide will help you get it right and set your sales team up for success.
What Is a Sales Compensation Structure?
A sales compensation structure defines how sales roles are paid based on performance, quotas, and revenue goals. It includes base salary, commissions, bonuses, and incentives. Companies use structured pay mixes like 50:50 or 70:30 to align earnings with results.
Each structure is designed to motivate reps, reward outcomes, and support business growth. The right compensation model varies by role, such as AE, SDR, or CSE, and adjusts for territory, quota size, and KPIs. A clear, fair structure improves retention, boosts productivity, and ensures alignment with company strategy.
Why a Structured Sales Compensation Model Matters
A clear, thoughtfully designed compensation structure does more than calculate commissions. It solves several common problems sales leaders face:
1. Drives the Right Sales Behaviors
If your business is focused on upselling and retention, but your compensation only rewards new logo acquisition, you’ll end up misaligning incentives. The structure should nudge reps toward the activities that drive strategic business growth, whether that’s multi-year contracts, product bundling, or renewal targets.
2. Aligns Reps With Company Objectives
Sales teams often operate in silos unless guided by clear performance metrics tied to company priorities. A well-defined compensation structure ensures that sales professionals are focused on hitting quotas that feed into quarterly revenue goals, customer satisfaction scores, or net revenue retention.
3. Encourages Transparency and Fairness
One of the most overlooked benefits of a structured model is its ability to remove ambiguity. When reps clearly understand what they’re being paid for and how their performance affects that, it reduces friction, builds trust, and creates a more productive work environment.
4. Helps Retain High Performers
Top-performing sales representatives don’t just look for high pay; they look for predictability, fairness, and scalability. If a compensation structure rewards overachievement with tiered commissions or accelerators, it gives high performers a reason to stay and invest in long-term success.
Different sales roles contribute to revenue in different ways, and your compensation structure should reflect that. An inside sales rep closing smaller accounts might work well with a flat-rate commission per sale, while a senior account executive managing multi-month enterprise deals might benefit from a tiered commission model with accelerators for surpassing quotas.
Similarly, a customer success executive driving renewals and upsells might be incentivized based on retention metrics like net revenue retention or customer expansion revenue.
Companies that fail to tailor compensation structures to role-specific responsibilities often see suboptimal performance and higher turnover. A one-size-fits-all plan risks undervaluing complex, high-effort sales activities or overpaying for low-impact behaviors.
Key Components of a Sales Compensation Structure
A strong sales compensation structure isn’t just about who gets paid and how much; it’s a strategic system that links rep sales performance to company revenue.
Below are the essential components that make up an effective structure, along with a comparison table to show how they work together across different roles.
1. Base Salary
The fixed portion of a salesperson’s total compensation. It provides financial stability and reflects the value reps bring beyond closing deals, like pipeline hygiene, training, internal collaboration, and CRM updates.
- Higher base pay is common in roles that influence but don’t close revenue directly (e.g., CSMs, SEs).
- Lower base, higher variable is typical in closing roles like Account Executives where performance is more controllable.
A stable base keeps your team grounded, especially in longer sales cycles or complex deal environments. It ensures reps aren’t pressured to close the wrong deals just to get paid.
2. Variable Pay
This is the performance-based component, which can include:
- Commission: A percentage of the revenue or margin from closed deals.
- Bonuses: Fixed payouts for reaching specific milestones (e.g., hitting quarterly targets).
- SPIFFs: Short-term rewards to encourage focus on specific behaviors like pushing a new product or cross-sells.
The right mix of these levers depends on what behaviors you’re trying to drive and how closely performance can be tied to individual impact.
3. Sales Quotas and KPIs
These define what success looks like for each role. Sales quotas are typically revenue or pipeline goals, while KPIs track the inputs that lead to those outcomes.
- AEs may be measured by booked revenue.
- SDRs might focus on qualified meetings or SQLs.
- CSMs often track renewal rates or Net Revenue Retention (NRR).
Clarity in quotas and KPIs ensures reps know where to focus and how their performance will be measured and rewarded.
4. Pay Mix Ratio
The pay mix is the balance between fixed salary and variable incentive. It signals how much risk and reward a rep takes on.
- 50:50 (50% base, 50% variable) is standard for closing roles like AEs.
- 70:30 or 80:20 is more common for support or prospecting roles like SDRs or SEs.
Aligning the mix with role control ensures fairness and motivates the right level of risk-taking.
5. Accelerators and Decelerators
These are modifiers to the commission rate based on quota attainment:
- Accelerators increase the commission rate when reps exceed their sales target, rewarding high performers.
- Decelerators reduce the rate if reps underperform, discouraging low effort or sandbagging.
When used thoughtfully, accelerators and decelerators can drive consistent effort across the board, not just from top performers, but from the entire team. The goal is to stretch performance without pushing reps into risky or unsustainable behavior.
6. Commission Caps (or No Cap)
Some companies limit how much a rep can earn in commission, while others choose uncapped plans.
- Caps help with budgeting, but can demotivate top performers.
- No caps encourage overperformance but require strong forecasting and finance alignment.
The choice depends on your growth phase and how predictable your deal cycles are.
Comparison Table: Sales Compensation Structure by Role
Types of Sales Compensation Structures (With Pros & Cons)

Choosing the right sales compensation structure helps you motivate reps, reward the right outcomes, and stay aligned with business or sales goals. Below are the most common models, explained simply.
1. Base Salary + Commission
This hybrid model is the most widely used in B2B sales. Reps receive a fixed base salary along with commissions for closed deals. The pay mix varies (e.g., 70:30 or 60:40), depending on the role and company stage. It’s ideal for roles where building relationships and solution selling take time, such as Account Executives.
For 2025, the average salary structure increase is projected at 2.5%, lagging the 3.8% average budget for individual increases.
2. Commission-Only
In this commission-only structure, reps earn income solely through commissions. It’s high-risk, high reward. While it lowers upfront cost for employers, it often results in high turnover and suits only experienced, self-motivated reps, typically in short-cycle, transactional sales environments.
On average, organizations are budgeting 6%-7% of payroll for broad-based variable pay in 2025, with much higher targets of 30%+ for executives.
In many regions, commission-only plans must still comply with minimum wage laws. For example, under the U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employers must ensure that total commissions earned average out to at least the federal minimum wage for all hours worked.
3. Tiered Commission Structure
Tiered commissions increase the payout rate as reps hit higher levels of performance. For example, 5% up to 100% of quota, 7% from 100–120%, and 10% beyond that. This sales commission structure is designed to push reps to exceed targets and rewards top performers disproportionately.
4. Draw Against Commission
A draw is an advance on future commissions. Reps receive regular payments that are reconciled against their earned commission. This is helpful for new hires during ramp-up or in industries with long sales cycles. Draws can be recoverable (paid back through future earnings) or non-recoverable.
5. Revenue-Based Commission
Reps are paid a commission percentage of total sales revenue. It’s easy to calculate and works well when pricing is consistent. However, since it doesn’t account for deal profitability, it may encourage unnecessary discounting to close deals.
6. Profit-Based Commission
Here, commission is based on the profit margin of a deal, rather than revenue. This approach ensures reps are motivated to protect pricing and avoid over-discounting. It’s more complex to manage, as it requires clear visibility into cost structures.
7. Milestone-Based Compensation
Rather than rewarding only closed deals, this model pays reps for completing specific sales milestones, such as setting up demos, submitting proposals, or advancing deals to certain pipeline stages. It’s useful in long, multi-step sales processes where closing takes time.
8. Activity-Based Compensation
This structure pays reps based on completing key activities, calls made, emails sent, and meetings booked. Often used with SDRs, it encourages consistent pipeline-building behavior, even if those activities don’t immediately lead to closed deals.
9. Retention/Upsell-Based Compensation
Ideal for post-sale roles like Account Managers or Customer Success, this model rewards renewals, expansions, and upsells. It aligns with long-term customer value and helps maintain strong relationships beyond the initial sale.
10. Split Commission Structure
When multiple team members contribute to a deal, commissions can be split between them. For example, an SDR who sets a meeting, an AE who closes, and a CSM who retains. It promotes cross-functional collaboration and ensures fair credit.
Sales Compensation Structure Comparison Table
How to Structure Sales Compensation: A Step-by-Step Framework

Designing a sales compensation structure isn’t just about math; it’s about aligning incentives with business strategy, sales behavior, and operational realities. Here's how to get it right, step by step:
1. Define Business and Revenue Goals
Before you talk numbers, clarify what success looks like. Are you targeting rapid growth? Maximizing retention? Driving multi-product adoption?
- If your goal is net new revenue, your plan should emphasize closing deals.
- If you're focused on expansion and upsells, reward renewals, and account growth.
- For market entry or product launches, incentivize early traction and new logos.
Your comp structure should serve as a behavioral nudge, pointing reps toward what matters most to the business right now.
2. Map Compensation to Specific Sales Roles
Every role in the sales org influences revenue differently, so each should be measured and rewarded accordingly.
- SDRs might be compensated for booked meetings or a qualified pipeline.
- AEs focus on closed revenue, often with quota-based targets.
- CSMs or AMs should have compensation tied to retention, renewal rates, and expansion revenue.
Avoid using a one-size-fits-all model. Tailoring compensation plans to role responsibility improves fairness, focus, and performance.
3. Choose the Right Pay Mix
Your pay mix defines how much is fixed vs. variable in an employee’s comp.
- 50:50 is typical for high-impact closing roles in fast-growth companies.
- 70:30 suits consultative or enterprise roles with longer sales cycles.
- 80:20 is often used for roles with indirect revenue impact, like Sales Engineers.
The more influence a rep has over a deal, the more variable their comp should be. But beware: a highly variable comp model without adequate base pay can increase churn or lower morale.
4. Set Realistic Quotas and KPIs
Quotas should challenge reps but still feel achievable.
- Base quotas on historical performance, market conditions, and rep tenure.
- Consider territory potential, seasonality, and deal size.
- Set leading KPIs like meetings or pipeline coverage to encourage activity, alongside lagging metrics like revenue.
When quotas are fair, reps trust leadership, and trust drives performance.
5. Choose a Commission Model That Matches Your Sales Motion
This is where your compensation structure can make or break motivation. Common models include:
- Flat-rate commissions – simple, consistent reward for every dollar sold.
- Tiered commissions – boost payouts as reps surpass quota (e.g., 10% up to 100% of quota, 15% beyond).
- Hybrid models – blend base commission with bonuses tied to milestones or KPIs.
This is also where complexity creeps in. That’s why many high-growth sales orgs use Everstage to automate real-time commission tracking, tier logic, and payout transparency, so reps always know what they’ve earned and what they need to close to unlock more.
6. Decide on Payout Frequency
Payouts affect motivation and cash flow.
- Monthly payouts give frequent feedback but require clean and timely data.
- Quarterly payouts smooth out spikes but delay recognition.
- Decide whether to pay on bookings, invoicing, or collections, based on your risk tolerance and cash model.
Clarity here is critical; nothing sours morale faster than confusion over when commissions hit the bank.
7. Add Levers Like Accelerators, SPIFFs, and Caps
Use these carefully to fine-tune behavior:
- Accelerators: Reward reps with higher sales commission rates once they exceed quota.
- SPIFFs: Offer time-bound bonuses to push specific actions (e.g., selling a new product or entering a new region).
- Caps: Set a maximum commission payout if you need to control margins, but beware of disincentivizing top performers.
Think of these as tactical incentives to encourage specific results, not a substitute for a solid foundational plan.
8. Communicate and Reinforce the Plan
Even the best-designed compensation plan will fail if reps don’t understand it.
- Explain the logic behind the structure, not just the numbers.
- Create simple, visual documents that reps can reference.
- Use onboarding and enablement sessions to align new hires.
- Build in transparency, when reps can track earnings and progress clearly, trust and motivation increase.
A sales compensation structure is a lever for business growth. When it's built around clear goals, adapted to each role, and supported with transparent tools, it becomes more than a pay system; it becomes a performance engine.
Sales Compensation Structure Examples by Role
Below are real-world compensation setups inspired by Everstage templates, tailored to different sales roles. These examples illustrate effective strategies for aligning payout with behavior and impact:
1. Presales Engineer
Overview:
Presales Engineers are technical influencers in complex B2B sales cycles. While they don’t carry a direct revenue quota, their contributions, through solutioning, demos, and proof of concepts (POCs), often determine the success of high-value deals. Their compensation reflects this indirect but critical impact.
- Pay Mix: 80:20 (Base + Bonus)
- Quota: No direct revenue quota
- Key Metrics: Number of qualified POCs, successful demos, and deal conversion support
- Commission Model: Bonus-based; fixed payouts for completed POCs and deal involvement
- Payout Notes: Bonuses are milestone-based and paid quarterly upon validation by AEs or Sales Managers
Example Plan Structure:
- $100,000 OTE [On-Target Earnings]→ $80,000 base + $20,000 bonus
- $500 for every qualified POC completed
- $1,000 bonus for each deal won where Presales was actively involved
- Target: 10–12 POCs per quarter
Why it works:
This structure rewards technical depth and sales collaboration, without tying engineers to commercial metrics. It creates a strong link between enablement and sales velocity, ensuring engineering support is recognized and incentivized.
2. Customer Success Executive (CSE)
Overview:
CSEs are responsible for post-sale revenue through renewals and account expansion. Their compensation is built around retention and growth metrics, encouraging them to reduce churn, drive product adoption, and spot upsell opportunities.
- Pay Mix: 75:25 (Base + Variable)
- Quota: $300,000 renewals + $100,000 upsell revenue per quarter
- Key Metrics: Net Revenue Retention (NRR), Expansion Revenue, Churn Rate
- Commission Model: % of revenue retained and expanded
- Payout Notes: Paid quarterly, based on revenue realization and client health
Example Plan Structure:
- $100,000 OTE → $75,000 base + $25,000 variable
- 5% of retained renewal revenue
- 8% of expansion revenue
- Revenue must stay active for 30 days post-renewal to be counted
- Bonuses capped only by revenue earned
Why it works:
By anchoring incentives to long-term outcomes, this plan motivates CSEs to think beyond short-term renewals and invest in customer success strategies. It supports sustainable growth, especially in PLG or subscription-led SaaS businesses.
3. Sales Development Representative (SDR)
Overview:
SDRs create a pipeline by qualifying leads and booking meetings for AEs. Since they sit at the top of the funnel, their compensation focuses on early-stage metrics, specifically, the number and quality of meetings.
- Pay Mix: 70:30 (Base + Variable)
- Quota: 15–25 Qualified Meetings (or SQLs) per month
- Key Metrics: SQLs booked, AE acceptance, ICP fit
- Commission Model: Flat bonus per qualified meeting, with SPIFFs for high-impact leads
- Payout Notes: Paid monthly, based on CRM validation and AE acceptance
Example Plan Structure:
- $60,000 OTE → $42,000 base + $18,000 variable
- $50/meeting for up to 15 SQLs
- $75/meeting beyond 15
- SPIFF: $200/month bonus for 3+ meetings that convert to pipeline opportunities
- Qualified meeting = ICP-fit + attended + AE approved
Why it works:
This model drives volume without sacrificing quality. The SPIFFs add upside potential for SDRs who consistently deliver leads that convert deeper into the funnel, while Everstage’s real-time tracking prevents disputes around lead qualification.
Finalizing the Sales Commission Agreement
Once you’ve designed the right compensation structure, the next step is to formalize it. A well-drafted sales commission agreement ensures transparency, reduces disputes, and aligns everyone on expectations.
A good commission agreement should leave no room for ambiguity. Here’s what to include:
1. Role-Specific Plan Summary
Start with a brief summary of the compensation plan tailored to the individual’s role. This includes the pay mix (e.g., 60:40 base to variable), plan type (commission, bonus, or hybrid), and expected responsibilities. Make it specific, avoid using a generic format for all reps.
For example, an Account Executive’s plan will focus on ACV and bookings, while a Customer Success Executive's plan will prioritize renewals and upsells.
2. Quota and KPI Definitions
Define what counts towards target attainment. For SDRs, clarify the definition of a “Qualified Meeting” or SQL. For AEs, state what revenue is eligible, only net-new ACV or does expansion count? For Customer Success, define retention thresholds, upsell attribution, or NRR. Use CRM-tracked metrics wherever possible to avoid manual reconciliation.
3. Commission Calculation Rules
Detail exactly how commissions are calculated, whether they are flat-rate (e.g., $100/SQL), tiered (e.g., 5% up to quota, 7% beyond), or milestone-based (e.g., $1,000 per successful POC). Include any applicable accelerators, caps, or minimum thresholds. Be transparent about how split deals, discounts, or clawbacks affect the payout.
4. Payout Schedule
Clearly state when commissions will be paid. Common options include:
- Monthly (based on bookings or closed-won deals)
- Quarterly (post-revenue realization)
- Post-collection (after client payment is received)
Include the cutoff date for calculations (e.g., “Deals booked by the last business day of the month will be paid in the following month’s payroll”).
5. Conditions and Exceptions
Cover edge cases that could otherwise cause friction. Examples include:
- Clawbacks for churned deals within a set period
- Split deals between multiple reps or teams
- Role changes mid-cycle and how they impact payout
- Delayed payments due to billing issues
Keep this section simple but precise. Reference internal CRM or compensation tools for validation logic.
6. Plan Duration and Review Cadence
Mention the plan’s effective date and duration, typically tied to a fiscal year or quarter. Also clarify how often the plan will be reviewed or revised (e.g., “Reviewed semi-annually based on market conditions or performance trends”). Any updates should be communicated and signed off on again.
7. Signatures and Approval
Finalize the agreement with formal sign-offs. Involve HR and legal to ensure compliance, and require both the sales rep and their manager to sign it. Digital signature tools (like DocuSign) can streamline this process, especially in remote or hybrid teams.
Tip: Give reps quick access to their plan. Use your CRM, HRIS, or a compensation tool like Everstage to share a one-page digital summary of each rep’s plan, including their quota, commission tiers, and performance dashboard. This avoids confusion and saves managers time spent re-explaining how pay is structured.
Conclusion: Aligning Compensation with Strategy
The most effective sales compensation plans do more than just pay people; they drive the right behaviors and outcomes. Whether you’re compensating AEs for revenue, SDRs for qualified meetings, or CSMs for retention, your plan should mirror your go-to-market strategy.
Here’s the key takeaway:
Comp plans work best when they are clear, fair, and flexible.
- Clarity ensures that every rep knows exactly how they’re being rewarded.
- Fairness builds trust and motivation across teams.
- Adaptability allows you to evolve your model as the business grows.
As your sales team scales and market conditions shift, review your comp structure quarterly or biannually. Even a small tweak, like adjusting accelerators or quota metrics, can lead to big improvements in performance and retention.
Still calculating commissions manually or struggling with rep trust?
Everstage automates the entire compensation cycle, from plan design to payout, so you can scale without disputes.
Book a personalized demo and see how to drive quota attainment without payout chaos.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is a sales compensation structure?
A sales compensation structure is a plan that outlines how sales roles are paid based on performance. It includes components like base salary, commission, bonuses, quotas, and incentives. These structures help align sales efforts with business goals and motivate reps to hit their targets.
2. How do you structure a sales compensation plan?
To structure a sales compensation plan, define business goals, align roles to revenue impact, choose a pay mix (e.g., 50:50 or 70:30), set realistic quotas and KPIs, select a commission model, and determine payout frequency. Include accelerators or SPIFFs where needed and clearly communicate the plan.
3. What are the best practices for designing a sales compensation structure?
Best practices include aligning pay with role responsibilities, keeping plans transparent, setting measurable KPIs, using data to inform pay mix, incorporating accelerators for top performance, and reviewing plans regularly. Clear communication and fairness across roles are essential.
4. What’s the difference between a tiered and flat compensation structure?
A tiered compensation structure increases commission rates as reps exceed quotas (e.g., 5% up to quota, 7% at 120%, 10% beyond). A flat structure offers a consistent rate regardless of attainment. Tiered models better incentivize overperformance.
5. What metrics should a compensation structure be based on?
Key metrics include revenue closed, quotas attained, SQLs booked, customer retention, upsell value, and net revenue retention. These metrics vary by role; AEs may focus on closed deals, while CSMs may be measured on renewal or upsell performance.
6. Can a platform like Everstage help improve your sales compensation structure?
Yes, Everstage helps streamline and automate your sales compensation structure. It enables accurate commission tracking, real-time visibility for reps, and data-backed insights for managers. With Everstage, companies can reduce payout errors, align incentives with performance goals, and scale compensation plans as teams grow, without manual overhead.