Research Partner
UserEvidence
424 RevOps pros
US & UK · 2026
Everyone bought AI.
Few are getting the gains.
We surveyed 424 RevOps leaders with UserEvidence to measure the gap between AI-native teams and everyone bolting AI onto legacy stacks — and what separates transformational results from incremental ones.

Six key findings
What separates AI-native RevOps from everyone else.
Six patterns emerged from 424 responses — each marking a stage in the journey from bolt-on adoption to AI-native leadership. The full report breaks every finding down by company size, industry, and AI maturity.
01
The AI commitment gap
91%
say AI was worth the investment
02
The bolt-on trap
63%
of AI-native teams see 20%+ productivity gains
03
The awareness paradox
2x
more likely to fear falling behind
04
The automation gap
13%
of AI-native teams have full automation
05
Speed first, cost last
88%
rank speed or insight a top-3 priority
06
From support to strategy
15x
more likely to hold a strategic role
Methodology
How this research was done.
Conducted by UserEvidence, an independent research firm, on behalf of Everstage. We're showing our work.
Research partner
UserEvidence
Respondents
424 RevOps pros
Geography
US (69%) · UK (31%)
Company size
200–10,000+ staff
What RevOps leaders are saying



