Introduction
Bringing on a VP of Sales is a pivotal moment for any scaling company. It’s a sign that your business is moving beyond founder-led sales and into a stage where predictable revenue, team structure, and scalable processes truly matter. But building a sales compensation package for this role? That’s where even the most seasoned operators pause.
Too high a base, and you risk overspending before results show. Too much variable pay, typically anything above 60% of total compensation, can feel overly aggressive, potentially deterring qualified candidates who value income stability.
Equity, bonuses, commissions, long-term incentives- how do you bring it all together into something that drives performance, retains leadership talent, and aligns with your company’s trajectory?
The truth is, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. But there are proven models, benchmark data, and practical strategies that growing SaaS companies rely on to get it right. In this guide, we’ll break down exactly how to craft a VP of Sales compensation structure that fits your business goals, motivates strategic execution, and helps you scale without second-guessing your investment.
Whether you're hiring your first VP of Sales or revisiting your current comp plan post-funding, you'll find actionable insights here. Let’s dive in.
What is a VP of Sales Compensation Structure?
A VP of Sales compensation structure is a strategic pay model designed to reward sales leadership for driving revenue, managing teams, and achieving company-wide goals. It typically includes a base salary, variable incentives, performance bonuses, equity, and on-target earnings (OTE) tied to quotas.
Unlike AE or SDR plans, VP compensation aligns with long-term growth and team performance. The structure supports scalable leadership, market expansion, and retention. Clear KPIs, fair payouts, and competitive benchmarks define the model.
Effective VP plans balance base pay with variable rewards to drive accountability, transparency, and revenue-focused outcomes across regions or business units.
Key Components of a VP Sales Compensation Plan
.avif)
A great plan blends base salary, performance-based pay, equity, and perks into a model that both motivates and retains. Let’s break down each component that typically makes up a well-structured VP compensation package.
1. Base Salary
Base salary forms the foundation of the VP's compensation package and provides financial stability as the VP builds and scales the sales function. The exact amount varies by company size, growth stage, and location.
- Early-stage startups (Seed to Series A): typically offer $140K–$180K, with more upside in equity to offset the lower fixed pay.
- Growth-stage companies (Series B/C): range between $180K–$220K, balancing competitive salary with long-term incentives.
- Late-stage or enterprise firms: often pay $220K–$300K+, targeting experienced operators who can drive large-scale revenue engines.
Equally important is the fixed vs. at-risk balance. A typical split is 60/40 or 70/30 between base and variable pay. Companies looking to de-risk the hire might lean toward 70% base, ensuring the VP has stable income while still being incentivized to perform.
2. Variable Pay & Commission
Variable pay, or performance-linked compensation, accounts for the at-risk portion of the VP’s On-Target Earnings (OTE). While VPs may still participate in select strategic deal-closing, the primary focus shifts to team performance and broader strategic outcomes, such as regional quota attainment, enterprise expansion, and new market development.
Most companies structure OTE to include:
- Revenue milestones such as ARR growth
- Hitting team-wide quota targets
- Securing new logo wins or expanding enterprise accounts
While the ratio may vary, many high-growth firms adopt a 60/40 base-to-variable structure. Crucially, top-performing VPs should see uncapped commissions with accelerators (e.g., 1.25x payout for 125% target achievement) to encourage sustained overperformance.
3. Equity or Stock Options
Equity is often a defining factor in closing high-caliber VP talent. It gives the VP long-term skin in the game and aligns their success with that of the company. Two common forms are:
- Restricted Stock Units (RSUs): Typically used in later-stage or public companies.
- Stock Options: Common in early-stage startups, offering the potential for large upside as valuation increases.
Equity typically follows a 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff, meaning the VP must stay a year to earn any equity and then continue earning over time. It’s also common to tie vesting milestones to key goals like geographic expansion or crossing revenue thresholds, reinforcing long-term alignment.
4. Performance Bonuses
While variable pay is based on revenue-related metrics, performance bonuses offer flexibility to reward strategic initiatives that don’t directly tie to quota. These might include:
- Launching a new GTM motion
- Expanding into new markets or verticals
- Building a high-performing sales org from scratch
Bonuses can be structured quarterly or annually. Some companies add bonus multipliers to reward exceptional achievement, like doubling a team’s ARR or reducing churn in key accounts. These bonuses help reinforce behaviors that aren’t captured in traditional commission plans.
5. Non-Monetary Incentives
Beyond pay and equity, top VPs of Sales are often swayed by non-monetary incentives that support their personal and professional growth. These might include:
- Leadership coaching or executive development stipends
- Comprehensive healthcare packages or family benefits
- Travel or sabbatical perks for tenure-based rewards
- Professional memberships or access to exclusive industry events
A 2023 IRJEMS study showed that over half of employees reported satisfaction with non-financial rewards like professional development and recognition, key levers to include in VP-level compensation plans.
These benefits show a commitment to the VP’s long-term success and wellbeing, and they also function as strong retention tools in competitive markets.
3 Typical VP of Sales Compensation Structure
While every company’s compensation philosophy is unique, most SaaS firms adopt one of three foundational structures for VP of Sales pay. These models reflect differences in growth stage, risk appetite, and leadership expectations.
Here's a breakdown of the most common formats:
1. 50/50 Base-to-Variable with 25% Accelerator
This structure offers equal weight to stability and performance, making it a strong choice for early-stage companies focused on aggressive growth. The VP receives 50% of their compensation as base salary and the remaining 50% as variable compensation, typically linked to quota attainment and ARR milestones.
For instance, a $300K OTE might break down as $150K base and $150K variable, with a $200K team quota requirement per rep or a multi-million dollar quota for the overall team.
A 25% accelerator activates when stretch goals are exceeded, for example, hitting 125% of quota unlocks 125% of the variable payout. This model often includes no cap on earnings, encouraging high-performing leaders to push beyond targets and scale revenue fast.
2. 70/30 Base-to-Variable + Equity
This model leans more conservative, with a higher guaranteed income and a lower at-risk component. It’s ideal for companies in their growth or Series B/C stage, where stability and process maturity matter as much as revenue expansion.
With 70% fixed base and 30% variable pay tied to metrics like team quota attainment or market expansion, it offers more predictability than aggressive comp splits. Equity grants often complement this model, vesting against milestones like regional launches or org-wide scaling.
Compared to a 50/50 model, the 70/30 split typically provides 10–15% higher guaranteed compensation, making it attractive to experienced VPs who value consistency alongside long-term upside.
3. Year-over-Year (YoY) Growth-Based Model
More common among mature SaaS firms, this structure is designed to reward sustainable growth over time. Rather than focusing on quarterly or individual deals, variable pay is tied to YoY improvements in revenue, ARR, or net revenue retention.
For example, hitting a 20% YoY ARR growth target might unlock 100% of the VP’s variable compensation target (e.g., $100K bonus on a $300K OTE with a 70/30 split). Surpassing stretch goals may trigger accelerated payouts or equity refreshers that vest over multiple years, encouraging sustained momentum.
This model is well-suited to companies that have moved past the early GTM grind and are now optimizing for predictable, compound growth. It also helps avoid the short-termism that can result from quota-only models, focusing instead on strategic initiatives and long-term value creation.
Each of these structures offers a different balance of risk, reward, and alignment. The right choice depends on your company’s current stage, sales motion, and leadership expectations.
How to Design Your VP of Sales Compensation Structure
.avif)
Designing a VP of Sales compensation plan isn’t just about plugging numbers into a spreadsheet. It’s about aligning incentives with your company’s growth objectives, leadership expectations, and financial realities.
Here’s a step-by-step framework to ensure your comp plan sets your VP, and your business, up for long-term success.
Step 1: Define Your Sales Strategy and Growth Goals
Before you talk numbers, get crystal clear on what you expect this VP to accomplish. Is your priority landing new business logos, driving expansion revenue from current customers, or increasing retention in a high-churn segment?
If your company is entering new geographies or launching a partner-led sales channel, the VP’s role will lean heavily into strategic execution and team building. In contrast, if you’re optimizing a well-oiled GTM motion, the focus might be on increasing efficiency and forecast accuracy.
Your compensation structure should reflect these goals. A VP tasked with breaking into new markets might warrant higher upside potential and equity, while one managing steady-state growth may benefit from a more balanced plan with stability in mind.
Step 2: Choose the Right Compensation Mix
Once your growth objectives are defined, choose a base-to-variable pay ratio that reflects the risk and maturity of the role. A 50/50 split might suit fast-paced, early-stage environments that require aggressive execution. A 70/30 mix is more common for later-stage companies focused on operational scale and stability.
Also consider equity or long-term incentives. These are essential for retaining top talent and ensuring that their personal success is tied to your company’s future value. Equity can also offset lower base salaries in high-risk environments, making your offer more competitive.
According to ICONIQ, a common benchmark for VP of Sales compensation is a 60/40 base-to-variable split. This ensures enough stability to retain senior leadership while maintaining a strong performance incentive aligned to revenue and team results.
Step 3: Set Clear, Measurable KPIs
Vague goals kill motivation. Choose 3–5 performance metrics that directly link to business outcomes and that your VP can influence. Common ones include:
- Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR)
- Team-wide quota attainment
- Pipeline growth or coverage
- Net revenue retention
Avoid overloading the plan with too many KPIs. When everything is a priority, nothing is. Define precise thresholds and payout tiers so there’s no ambiguity, e.g., “100% quota = 100% variable payout; 125% quota = 125% payout.”
This clarity fosters trust and accountability.
Step 4: Benchmark Against Industry Standards
Even the best-designed plan will fall flat if it’s not competitive. To ensure your offer stands up in the market, benchmark compensation using trusted sources like compensation reports from reputable consulting firms, industry associations, or peer startup communities.
Adjust your comp package based on:
- Funding stage (seed vs. Series C vs. pre-IPO)
- Geographic cost of labor
- Team size and reporting complexity
For example, a VP managing a 10-person global team across three regions will justifiably command a different package than one overseeing a five-person domestic team. Benchmarking ensures you don’t overpay, or worse, underpay and lose talent to competitors.
Step 5: Document, Communicate, and Revisit Quarterly
No one likes surprises, especially when it comes to compensation. Build a one-page summary that clearly outlines the structure, KPIs, bonus logic, equity terms, and vesting schedule. Supplement it with a detailed doc if needed, but keep the summary visible and aligned.
Then, revisit the plan at least quarterly. Growth-stage businesses evolve quickly. New funding, product pivots, or GTM shifts should all trigger a review. The best comp plans are dynamic, not set in stone.
Treat this as a strategic business tool, not just an HR checklist.
Best Practices for Structuring VP of Sales Compensation
A well-intentioned comp plan can still fail if it's poorly communicated, misaligned with strategy, or out of sync with the market. These best practices will help ensure your VP of Sales' compensation structure is not just competitive, but effective.
1. Ensure Clear Targets and KPIs
Your VP's comp plan should reflect more than just revenue. While ARR is important, it’s often a lagging indicator. Strong plans incorporate strategic business outcomes like regional expansion, sales team development, pipeline & revenue growth, or improving net revenue retention.
Examples of measurable and time-bound VP-level KPIs:
- “Expand into two new regional markets with at least $X in pipeline by Q3”
- “Reduce sales cycle duration by 15% through improved process design by H2.”
- “Hire and ramp 10 AEs to full productivity (80%+ quota attainment) by Q2”
- “Improve team-wide forecast accuracy to >90% across two consecutive quarters”
This clarity helps the VP prioritize efforts, and it protects you from ambiguous performance reviews.
2. Prioritize Transparency in Plan Design
Compensation ambiguity is one of the fastest ways to erode trust. Sales leaders want to know exactly how they’re measured and paid.
Be upfront about:
- How sales commissions and bonuses are calculated
- What triggers accelerators or equity refreshers
- How overperformance is rewarded
Avoid subjective metrics like “executive alignment” or “culture contribution” unless you’ve defined them in advance. Publish thresholds and mechanics that leave no room for guesswork. Transparency creates alignment, and alignment creates results.
3. Benchmark Against Competitive Market Rates
To stay competitive, leverage insights from executive recruiters, board members, industry networking groups, and past hiring data within your own ecosystem.
When benchmarking, look at:
- Stage of growth — A VP joining at pre-Product-Market Fit will expect more upside risk; post-Series B leaders look for stability and structured incentives.
- Org complexity — Comp should scale with the number of regions, revenue segments, or direct reports under the VP’s leadership.
- Location dynamics — Compensation expectations vary significantly between talent hubs like New York or London versus tier-2 cities.
Ultimately, market benchmarking isn’t about copying, it’s about calibrating. Your offer should reflect the value, responsibility, and competitive landscape for the role you’re hiring. A slight premium can help you win decisive talent in a tight market.
Conclusion
A thoughtful VP of Sales compensation structure blends base salary, performance-based pay, and long-term incentives to drive both accountability and strategic alignment. It’s not about copying what another company offers, it’s about creating a package that reflects your growth strategy, team maturity, and market dynamics.
Remember these core principles:
- Base pay rewards leadership stability
- Variable pay incentivizes execution
- Equity fosters long-term ownership
- Clear KPIs and transparency build trust
As your company evolves, so should your comp plan. Revisit it regularly, especially after funding rounds, GTM shifts, or new growth phases. The right structure doesn’t just pay your VP, it empowers them to lead.
For more advanced compensation modeling and benchmarking, tools like Everstage can provide structure, visibility, and data-backed alignment. Book a strategy call today.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a VP of Sales do in structuring compensation plans?
A VP of Sales designs and oversees compensation plans that align with company revenue and sales goals, team performance, and long-term growth. They define base-to-variable pay ratios, performance incentives, equity offerings, and quota-based rewards to attract and retain top leadership talent.
What are the best practices for structuring compensation for a VP of Sales?
Best practices include setting 3–5 clear KPIs, using a base-to-variable mix like 70/30 or 50/50, incorporating equity, and benchmarking against market data. Sales plans should reward both team performance and strategic milestones like ARR growth, retention, and new market expansion.
What performance metrics should be used in VP of Sales compensation?
Key metrics include annual recurring revenue (ARR), team sales quota attainment, pipeline growth, and net revenue retention. Metrics should tie directly to business impact and be easy to track. Overachievement bonuses or accelerators often reward hitting stretch goals.
What is the typical OTE for a VP of Sales in 2025?
In 2025, the VP of Sales OTE often follows a 60/40 or 70/30 base-to-variable pay structure. Total compensation varies by company size and growth stage, but typically ranges between $250K–$450K in US SaaS firms, including equity and bonuses.
How can compensation plans retain top sales leadership talent?
Compensation plans can retain top VPs by including equity, long-term incentives, clear growth-based bonuses, and transparent payout logic. Structuring rewards around sustainable sales performance and aligning compensation with company goals drives engagement and reduces attrition.
How often should VP of Sales compensation structures be reviewed or updated?
VP of Sales compensation plans should be reviewed at least annually and adjusted quarterly if the company is scaling quickly or post-funding. Frequent review ensures alignment with revenue forecasts, market competitiveness, and strategic changes.